Feedback
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/7/2004 1:11 PM Michael Trier
Very good assessment. When I saw your post I stopped what I was doing and read it immediately. This has been a subject that I've thought a lot about over the years. I wrote an <a href="http://michaeltrier.com/blog/articles/155.aspx">article</a> on the subject several years ago. Although my focus was more on my frustrations with the publishing industry, I think you offer a great alternative.
The value of the tech publisher is disappearing. Currently I'm reading several books, none of which I just picked up while browsing a book store. My sources are usually recommendations from others (personally or via a website review or blog) or I'm looking for something on a particular subject matter. In that case I go straight to Amazon and search it out.
Also factor in that you have no way to track the sales yourself when you publish through a major publishing house. I wrote two chapters for the SQL Server XML Distilled and never got a single comission check from either CurlingStone (AKA WROX) before they went bankrupt or APress after the book was republished. I've contacted them twice and I was always told they would "send me a check".
I've made more on my Amazon link to the book (via Amazon Associates) than I have made on the actual sales ($0) of the book.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/7/2004 2:38 PM DonXML Demsak
Bryant, Have you contacted Gary at APress? I know that the situation with Wrox was a real mess, but IMHO Gary is very professional, and always got back to me promptly. Thankfully, one of the book offers I turned down was with Curlingstone.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/7/2004 5:34 PM paul
The Record Companies became the Recording Industry and MP3's became a phenomena. Book publishers appeal to authers vanity and the perception that a “book” brings recognition, but we are about to turn the page and launch the ebook.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/8/2004 5:08 PM Joe Duffy
As Paul hinted at, I think the situation's very similar in the recording industry today, albeit a couple steps further along. Tools to create and distribute tunes are becoming more prevalent, and the ease with which new artists can get their music out there w/out the overhead of recording deals and expensive recording fees is getting better all the time.
There's one critical dimension that I think is overlooked, though. Buying from reputable publishing firms - Addison Wesley, for instance - provides for a level of trust between the seller and buyer. Yes the situation that you're describing might be better for the content creator, but will it really improve the experience for the reader? It would take more time to verify the integrity of the book author, and probably lead to frustrating purchases that fail to deliver (sans some third party willing to review and vouch for certain publications). Some areas might improve as well, however, such as more up to date books, wider array of selections, and perhaps cheaper prices (especially if the option to purchase digitally is offerred).
Just a couple thoughts.
#Geek Notes 2004-05-10 5/10/2004 9:53 AM Geek Noise
#Four Times Tidbitten 5/10/2004 10:22 AM Neopoleon.com
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 10:40 AM Mike Gunderloy
You left out entirely the costs of the people whose job it is to edit the author's words into actual English, to make sure everything flows logically, and to make sure that screenshots and diagrams are legible. Those are tasks at which many authors are very, very bad. Self-edited books are usually pretty awful.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 10:50 AM DonXML
Mike, Very good point, and this is exactly the type of feedback I'm looking for. Yes, I agree with you that I left it out, but it was on purpose. I think it is up to the author to determine if they need the different editors, and if so what type and how much. The same is true of reviewers. And, publishers don't always use quality editors or reviewers. So I left it up to the author to decide if they needed these services.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 11:16 AM DonXML
In thinking about this topic some more, I guess what I'm trying to say is that before you sign with a publisher, make sure you try to quantify the value that they add to your book, and not just use a publisher because that is what everyone does. Every situation is different, and they don't all require the same solution.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 11:37 AM Darrell
I'm not an author myself, but from a buyer's perspective, the stuff Mike Gunderloy talks about is crucial.
It is a shame that publishers do not provide *graphic* support for books in addition to the editorial support. Take a look at the first Scrum book by Schwaber for example. All the graphics are amateurish at best, which in no way reflects on the rest of the book.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 11:45 AM Larry O'Brien
Quality of most POD (Print-On-Demand) books is lower than what you expect to find in a bookstore. Specifically, the covers are flimsy and the binding (especially on a 600-page book) is usually weak.
If you have a strong belief that you'll sell more than a thousand or so books, risking an an offset run will give you a significantly lower cost-per-unit and higher quality.
Other than that, your analysis is spot-on. For that matter, throw in this additional thought: If you self-publish and have a success, you'll be in a very good bargaining position for your second edition if you think that a publisher could give you the "next level" in distribution and marketing. If, on the other hand, you publish a first-edition with a publisher, they _will_ have a short press run, throw it against the wall, and only if it sells well with little more marketing than you could provide yourself will they invest more money in marketing it and producing a second edition.
Self-publishing (or some form of coop publishing, which is something I've been mulling over) is absolutely the way to go.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 12:21 PM DonXML
Coop publishing is definitely the way to go, and I think that was the original idea behind APress, but at some point they crossed the line and became more like your typical publisher. But I think that all has to do with overhead, and trying to manage it.
I think it is about time for a coop publisher, especially for those niche market books, like SVG, XSLT, XForms.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 1:20 PM Randy
I went POD with iUniverse for my book - their hardcover and paperback is right in line with what I've seen/ordered from bookstores, but I'm around 250 pages. They are sorta on the expensive size, but all of the POD publishers seem to be in the same price range these days... if you can offer it, at all, which many fulltime authors cannot.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 1:25 PM mike
Gunderloy is right about editing and general publishing quality; you can see the difference in articles that are propped by the author vs those that get professional editing and production, like MSDN (as one example).
The imprint of a respected publisher does mean something, FWIW. For example, APress publishes good books, so the APress brand on a book can tell you that it's probably a reliable, quality book. Same for Addison-Wesley and others. As noted, however, without a significant number of potential buyers, a publisher probably will not take on a project.
As for eBooks, Scott Mitchell and Dan Appleman had an interesting conversation about the economics of eBooks (http://scottonwriting.com/sowblog/posts/314.aspx) in which the conclusion was that not yet ready for prime time. But it still seems like a good idea, even if the distribution channels haven't quite figured out the best way to deal with them.
#Graphic Support for Books 5/10/2004 6:21 PM Adam Kinney on .NET
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/10/2004 8:02 PM Bob Arnson
I've written, edited, and tech-edited, for both books and magazines. *Every* time a professional editor touched my copy, it's gotten better, at least overall. (There are bad edit jobs, but that's what revision tracking and version control are for.)
Tech reviewers are good, too. "With enough eyes, all bugs are shallow," after all. Sometimes just one more pair of eyes is all it takes.
This isn't a point in favor of publishers, BTW. Most editors that work for publishers are free-lance and would just as happily take your money as a publisher's. You can probably get tech reviewing done by local user group buddies or co-workers. The point is: If you're going to charge the same as the big publishers, readers are going to expect the same quality -- better, really, if they realize that you're getting more of they money.<g>
#Why Shouldn't Authors self publish 5/10/2004 9:30 PM Mind Tracks
DonXML Demsak of Grok This asks Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish?...
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/11/2004 12:57 AM Swaroop
This is a very interesting discussion indeed. I have written a free online book titled 'A Byte of Python' (http://www.python.g2swaroop.net) and I want to look forward to a print edition of the book.
One reason that I fret to approach a big publishing house is that they are known for taking undue advantage of yet-unknown ;-) authors like me. I am not pointing out anybody but this is my take on the subject.
With regards to getting it proofread, I am extremely happy to say that most of my readers do it for me! Once I received a mail from a reader that there is an extra space between a word and the dot on such and such line.....
Also, interested readers are now translating the book out of their own interest to Icelandic, Danish and Spanish.
In summary, e-books have their own advantages and disadvantages. Of course, I haven't made any money from the book *yet*. But consider 'Dive Into Python', it became very popular as an online book and was then published in print by APress. Similarly, I came across a book called OpenOffice.org XML Essentials in association with O'Reilly in a similar situation.....
Is this the new way of the publishing industry?
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/11/2004 7:08 AM Jonathan Gennick
Your question is a fair one. Just printing a book used to be a big deal, but now it's within reach of pretty much anyone, so the physical aspects of printing books aren't the compelling reason to use a publisher that they once were.
When I think about what a publisher has to offer, distribution is the first thing that comes to mind. Distribution drives sales. I've three friends and acquaintences who have self-published. To my knowledge, none of them has gone to a second printing. The one who does best is the one who spends time driving all over the Upper Penninsula to get his books (and his music CDs) into gas stations, gift shops, and other places where tourists will find them. He spends a LOT of time doing his own distribution. He's profitable, but he works hard at it.
Publishers also bring editing and book design skills to the table. These are more important than many might first think. Some of the self-published books I have aren't all that enjoyable to read.
Having said all of the above, and having written several books published by mainstream publishers, I'm intrigued by the idea of self-publishing. If I weren't employed by O'Reilly Media, I'd be very tempted to give self-publishing a go on one of my next books.
Lastly, a bit of self-disclosure: I work full-time as a computer-book editor, so you may want to take my comments with an appropriately sized grain of salt.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/11/2004 8:19 AM Jonathan Gennick
Actually, it would be more accurate of me to say that if ever O'Reilly balked at publishing one of my books, that's when I'd consider self-publishing. I get on very well with my O'Reilly editor (yes, even editors get edited), and I'm really quite happy to have O'Reilly covers on my books.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/11/2004 8:20 AM Tim O'Reilly
Let me second Jonathan's comments.
As a self-published author who grew into a publishing house, I certainly agree that it can be done. But when you do it, you no longer have time to be an author, because of all the other things that being a publisher entails -- from choosing and editing possible books by other authors to book production, inventory management, sales, marketing, distribution, collecting payment from customers, and the like.
The internet changes some of the dynamics, but far fewer of them than you might think.
You have only to look at the web to see the recapitulation of the history of print publishing. In only ten years, we went from a level playing field where the democratizing technology of the web made everyone equal to one where people pay marketing folks to get their web content listed appropriately on Yahoo! and Google. In short, we've seen the evolution of giant "publishers" like Yahoo!, CNet and the like; IBM Developerworks is as large a publisher of technical content as any book publisher. Why don't those authors just write for their own web site? In my essay, "<a href="http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2002/12/11/piracy.html">Piracy is Progressive Taxation</a>", I draw some lessons from book publishing for the music industry. Point 5 in particular addresses the question "why publishers."
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/11/2004 9:06 AM Chris Sells
Don't forget the cost of a good copy editor or someone to do the indexing. I don't know how much the former costs, but AW likes to charge me $500 for the later. Also, publishers do advertise the book, both in magazine ads and at tradeshow booths. And, you should ping Dan Appleman, who's done some electronic self-publishing.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 5/12/2004 5:33 AM Randy
With that being said, Tim, how would O'Reilly feel about a Geek-related fictional anthology? *wink wink* *nudge nudge* :)
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 7/25/2004 10:38 PM Andreas Duess
I part own a self publishing service in the UK, called 'Publish and be damned'. We have been in existence three months now and already three authors have published technical manuals with us.
When we first launched we thought thought that the majority of our clients would be novelists and such but it looks like the non fiction market is just as strong, if not stronger.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 9/5/2004 6:24 PM William (Bill) Vaughn
I've done both. I took my first book to MS Press and was turned down. I also hired an agent who could not place the manuscript. I got so many requests from MCS people I decided to self-publish. I used "tape" binding and 8.5x11 format with my own editing. It was pretty shabby by my standards today, but it sold very well. The problem I found is that bookstores wanted me to send them a dozen copies on "spec". If they sold, they would send me money, if they didn't I was supposed to "buy back" the books. I chose not to play that game (and in those days the Internet was not yet a viable channel). I sold (cash in advance) about 50 a week to companies and individuals all over the world. I sold one into Hong Kong and not another one into the orient (for some reason). I had a bookstore in the UK that paid to ship them to New York where he freighted them overseas. I made about $20 a book which is far more than the $1.50-$2.00 I make from bigger publishers. Many of my sales were by word-of-mouth recommendations and from exposure at trade shows. I got on with MS Press and Apress. Both of these had issues and didn't always follow through on marketing and promotion. Quite a bit of the price disappeared behind a complex set of royalty schedules and hold-back accounts. MS Press still owes me $6000 or so for books that haven't been selling for 3 years.
I think self-publishing can be a great way to get your foot in the door. I would spend the extra money on better binding, but not on the first book. The printing houses will want to make a big print run (several thousand books) and if you don't have the cash to invest (bet), you might just print enough for this month's projected sales. That way you can make changes as the technology evolves. Publishing electronically never has appealed to me but that's another alternative.
As a point of reference, I just finished my 9th book with Addison Wesley (the jury is still out) and I'm starting on my 10th.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 10/11/2004 3:30 PM Minh T. Nguyen
I recently self-published "Visual Studio .NET Tips and Tricks" (see http://www.enderminh.com) via POD-service lulu.com, and here are my thoughts.
- The good thing about self-publishing is that you are on your own and can decide your own price, format, and schedule. I've written this book over a period of more than a year, simply because I am awfully busy in my daily life. Publishers usually have very strict timelines which in my opinion can degrade the work if you are running from one conference to another. My book is also not very long (only 122 pages), which most publishers don't accept, but with self-publishing, hey it's your decision.
- The bad thing about self-publishing is that you are on your own. ;) So you have to do all the work yourself, from cover design, formatting, research and to hiring a copyeditor, indexer and doing your own promotion. That's all not that much work. The biggest problem with POD is that this doesn't bring your book into physical bookstores. However, I disagree that POD quality is bad. In fact, I can't see a difference from my book than another book I would find at Barnes and Nobles.
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 10/12/2004 8:09 AM Douglas Lyon
I love the idea of self publishing.
But what about marketing?
We have a PrenHall representitive who sends
e-mail to her region. PrenHall must have 100's of
reps sending 1000's of e-mails. They also
send out 100's of desk copies and we get
adoptions from various universities.
Now, the coop idea sounds like it will poor marketing
resources. But how much does GOOD marketing cost?
A single page ad in Java developers Journal could run upwards
of $1500. Can a coop afford this kind of advertisement?
#re: Why Shouldn’t Authors Self-Publish? 10/12/2004 9:15 AM Sebastien St-Laurent
I think self publishing can work good in niche markets. Such markets have limited marketing channels and it should be easier to get a bigger bang-for-the-buck than for a mass market type book.
Obviously, with self-publishing, you will make more money per-book. The key i think is to invest some of the return (and probably a little money upfront) into marketting. But the way i feel with my current publishing deals is that i still have to do my own marketting even with the measely 1-2$ i get per copy sold.
As for getting books into retail stores, there is a few issues. Especially with POD, it seems like the problem retail stores have isn't the quality of the print (I think it can be hard to tell the difference with a good POD company) but the fact that most POD's don't have a return policy. This means a big financial risk for the store as if the book doesn't sell, then they are stuck with the inventory.
However, some PODs such as Lighning Source allows you to permit returns which should go a long way into giving a book a chance to be picked up by retail outlets (with a little convincing and PR of course).
相关推荐
感谢我的父母和爷爷对我的爱,并希望爷爷不要为我担心,写书是件辛苦的事,但同时也使我收获良多。爸爸在第二版的最后阶段帮我订正文字,这本书里有你的功劳。我要感谢博文视点的各位朋友,感谢郭老师的理解和支持,...
感谢我的父母和爷爷对我的爱,并希望爷爷不要为我担心,写书是件辛苦的事,但同时也使我收获良多。爸爸在第二版的最后阶段帮我订正文字,这本书里有你的功劳。我要感谢博文视点的各位朋友,感谢郭老师的理解和支持,...
1假设图书类CBook的属性信息包括 (书名,作者,书号,出版社,出版年月等),构建CBooks类,由CBook组成,存放文件名、不同书信息以及排序及查找功能。试用所学的面向对象技术编程实现类似实习3的功能,用一个以上cpp...
本书通过一个名为Simplified Applicatiorl Franlework(SAF)的具体框架案例讲解了如何实际地开发应用框架。SAF框架是本书作者用C#开发的,它由许多实际应用中非常典型的通用服务组成,本书详细讲解了每个服务,阐明其...
我们四个一个寝室,没事就讨论怎么做这个作业,慢慢的从无从下手到有了一点头绪,最后终于完成了今天的成品。总结来说从这个文档的制作中学到了挺多的东西,从网上的成熟文档中有一些借鉴,但他们写的也有瑕疵,我们...
The Django Book 最初由 Apress 于 2007 年出版,题为 The Definitive Guide to Django: Web Development Done Right,后来又由两位作者在 2009 年重新出版,而且书名换成了 The Django Book。后者是一个开源项目,...
当你看前言的时候,不得不说你做出了一个聪明的选择,因为前言中有作者对整本书的 概括和学习建议,这会对大家之后的阅读产生事半功倍的效果。在聊这本书之前,首先给大 家一个本书所有配套源码和说明的链接: ht伽...
书中还结合数独游戏等实例更加形象生动地讲解了 android开发的基本流程,且每章最后都有一个 “快速阅读指南 ”,更加方便了读者的阅读。. 本书内容完整丰富,具有较强的通用性,读者都能通过本书快速学习 ...
近年来,软件工程领域的一个重大贡献是DeMarco和Lister在1987年出版的《人件》,我衷心地向我的读者推荐这本书。 ——《人月神话》第19章 《人月神话》关注“软件开发”本身,《人件》则关注软件开发中的“人...
进阶篇以一个实例贯穿全篇,阐述如何使用UML从头到尾地实施一个项目。总结篇针对在现实中经常遇到并且较难掌握的问题进行深入的探讨,升华在前几篇学习到的知识。 本书可供正在学习编程、软件工程等知识,准备将来...
Effective C++是世界顶级C++大师Scott Meyers的成名之作,初版于1991年。在国际上,这本书所引起的反响...书中的55条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。
虽然出版年代稍嫌久远,本书并没有第二版,原因是当其出版之时(1996),C++ Standard 已经几乎定案,本书即依当时的标准草案而写。其间与现今之 C++ 标准规格几乎相同。可能变化的几个弹性之处,Meyers 也都有所...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件界...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件界...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件界...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件界...
书中的50条准则,每一条都扼要说明了一个可让你写出更好的C++ 程序代码的方法,并以特别设计过的例子详加讨论。在此第二版中,Meyers重新检验了每一准则,特别注意兼容于C++标准规格与现行编译器技术,并融入软件...